Showing posts with label energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label energy. Show all posts

Thursday, August 31, 2017

Alfidi Capital at Intersolar ees SEMICON West 2017

I attended the mighty tripartite conference of Intersolar North America, ees North America, and SEMICON West 2017 at San Francisco's Moscone Center. The south hall of the convention center is undergoing a massive renovation, so the SEMICON folks had to cram into the west building with Intersolar. The reduced expo floor area was tolerable given the action-packed schedule. It's action-packed from my perspective, because I love sitting through long seminars and briefings that lesser mortals lack the fortitude to endure.

The Intersolar opening ceremony is always the first shin-dig on my calendar for this colossal conference. The main Intersolar conference has lots of finance seminars on the first day but I am too cheap to pay. These people had better invite me to speak someday. Anyway, CALSEIA and NREL celebrate their 40th anniversaries this year. I did not see any cake but that's okay, we all need to stick to our diets. Expect to hear more about behind-the-meter consumer-driven storage, because that's the industry term for how building owners are installing their own systems on-site. Everything in capitalism is of course consumer-driven, but the twist in renewable energy is that smaller storage systems give customers a lot more options than utilities have ever provided before. I wanted to hear from California politicians about how the state's proposed Energy Storage Initiative would affect the market but the usual big shots were not on hand. Maybe our mayor and governor had something better to do than promote solar energy, one of the Golden State's biggest growth industries.

It's the Alfidi Capital badge for Intersolar, ees, and SEMICON West 2017.

The opening ceremony left me with more questions than usual. Do solar energy companies really have thin profit margins (compared to, say, fossil fuel energy generators)? If PV costs keep dropping and PV panel volume GW installation keeps rising, why would solar companies have thinner margins than the broader energy sector? Will the solar sector shrink if the federal government cuts spending on solar R+D? If the energy grid evolves past net-metering to accommodate location-based price signals, will this drive demand for beacons and other IoT devices in the grid? Can blockchain tech really enable both on-grid energy trading and PPA investments? I mulled these questions while I was chomping on free food after the opening ceremony. They served roast beef this year, a step up from the usual turkey.

The SEMICON West welcome keynotes and opening ceremonies were next on my hit list. The hits just keep on coming. The assumed CAGR of 5-7% for the semiconductor sector through 2057 is a long forecast, but it seems reasonable if IoT adds to a mature sector. Anyone who thinks IoT won't drive the next wave of semiconductor volume growth needs to read everything I've ever blogged about both IoT and semiconductors. I keep hearing predictions about AI making the singularity either a decade or two away, but there's no consensus among gurus. We all get to learn some new buzz phrases: edge computing (now with IoT and AR/VR) and fog computing (I've heard that one before). The progression goes from edge to fog to cloud, and into your brain at some point once we hit that singularity. One brilliant executive shared his insights into "Neumann and Neuromorphic" innovation to create intelligence that reminded me of Transhumanism.

I came away from SEMICON's opening presentations with a few original insights. I would post them on SemiWiki but I don't work in the sector. I think that when gross payroll grows faster than headcount at semiconductor enterprises funded as public/private partnerships, it shows the creation of high-income, value-added jobs. The semiconductor sector now uses more elements of the periodic table than ever, so materials sourcing will soon become a crucial "table stakes" factor. The entire tech sector needs to take supply chain security seriously, and that means not taking single sources in the developing world for granted, especially if those sources rely upon transportation links that will be at risk during geopolitical instability. Check out the South China Sea tensions for a glimpse of near-term supply chain insecurity.

The ees people gave us a look at their market, regulatory environment, and some business policies. I would like them to explain why they don't capitalize themselves as EES, but I don't run their part of the show. It's their world of batteries and I just live in it. There should be little concern about backsliding if one speaker is correct about state governments doing 80% of the policy work in renewable energy. I just wonder how they measure that impact, and whether the remaining 20% is crucial stuff like the DOE SunShot Initiative. There is no policy initiative imaginable that will force solar power into the baseload category, because it is physically impossible for the sun to shine at night. Policies favoring storage linked to solar and wind power do not change nature. Power grid management with distributed storage will require revisions to the standard installed capacity (ICAP) the ISOs calculate for their markets. Adding BIPV and and other new tech to generation reduces the ICAP demand-related charges, thus adding value to a property owner's business model.

I want to throw some more red meat buzzwords out there to show the ees people that I paid attention. Electric energy storage used for load leveling is "energy arbitrage," using time shifting to make stored energy available during higher demand periods. Its corollary is "peak shaving," encouraging reduced energy consumption during high-demand periods. California and New York are among the states pushing "distributed resource tariffs" that enable utilities to install more generating capacity on their customers' sites. Virtual power plants will aggregate these distributed generation resources into a cloud-based management model. Anyone making or selling distributed generation or storage solutions must know the NERC critical infrastructure protection (CIP) standards and FERC guidance for CIP implementation. The US Midwest's wind corridor is an underserved market for storage solutions and grid connectivity. Cogeneration (CHP) and trigeneration (CCHP) present a wide array of product choices that storage solutions vendors can adapt into sales pitches.

The ees finance and bankability sessions built on the above policy topics. Vendors who get on a project finance company's pre-approved list of trustworthy service providers have a big leg up in getting customer referrals. Refer to my blog articles on previous Intersolar conferences for PACE explanations, and know that PACE applies to both residential (RPACE) and commercial (CPACE) properties. Storage systems with a useful life less than the typical PACE payback period are probably not worth selling. The bottom line from banks authorizing loans and leases for energy products is a provable revenue stream; no stream means the project developer must seek equity investors rather than issuing debt. Energy storage is now considered a "front of meter" function requiring new metrics for assessing charges, compared to "behind the meter" generation's demand charges.

One dude from a leading semiconductor equipment supplier had a free e-book for those of us attending his talk. I didn't sign up for his e-book because I have way too much stuff to read through already. Early concern among SEMI manufacturers that Moore's Law would stop at one micron no longer applies. He shared a few platitudes on good management and organizational culture. The dude needs to go work at Uber where those factors are deficient. SEMI held their annual awards presentation afterwards and someone mentioned the Hybrid Memory Cube Consortium pushing the next big thing in DRAM design. I'll have more to say about that consortium if they have events offering free food.

The SEMICON keynotes tend to be slick sales pitches from major sponsors, but once in a while some worthy tidbits appear. Leading IoT and cloud providers have latched onto autonomous vehicles as their next big cash cow target because those cars generate continuous large data streams. Expect services and advertising focused on consumers sitting passively in self-driving cars for hours. I expect these cars to converge with the sharing economy, whose consumers are too poor to own their own cars. Most ads they will see will probably be for other sharing services, like grocery coupons. You heard it here first at Alfidi Capital.

I went back to the ees stage to see what tech advancements are maximizing ROI. Track the GTM US Energy Storage Monitor for the latest industry developments. I mentioned peak shaving above, and storage capacity determines its flexibility. The industry claims that storage manufacturing costs have fallen in recent years, similar to PV manufacturers' cost trajectories, as delivered units have risen. Utility tariff structures and time of use (TOU) policies determine use cases that demonstrate demand charge management that storage system vendors can offer. Most states allow net metering of solar but not storage, so using storage means time shifting, peak shaving, and load balancing to manage power costs. Residential HVAC activation and EV charging are primary drivers of daily household power use spikes. It is clear to me that distributed generation and storage will severely threaten the business models of utilities that do not rapidly move to adapt. Utilities that survive should evolve to finance, install, and manage residential generation and storage, just to capture part of those revenue streams.

I enjoyed attending the Intersolar Orange Button Software Launch, and not just because they had free coffee. The SunSpec Alliance Open Solar Data Exchange (SunSpec oSDX) sponsored the launch because it is part of DOE's Orange Button initiative for standardizing solar bankability data. Getting Alfidi Capital into this program is a bonanza for name recognition. I don't offer financing or provide any other client services to program participants. My interests include knowing which tools programmers must use to be compatible with Orange Button APIs.

The SEMICON West Bulls and Bears Industry Outlook was something I could not miss. I would be perfectly willing to present my own sector views at this forum someday. I just don't want other analysts stealing my work. Gartner and other research purveyors still forecast semiconductor sector growth. There's a widespread expectation that IoT will be part of that growth; you know, maybe these analysts have been stealing that insight from me since I've blogged it for years. I believe the IoT automotive apps driving chip demand are also enabling other value-adding services like fleet management and stolen vehicle recovery (tied to insurance coverage). The semiconductor content in AI is hard to predict, with analysts uncertain about higher CAGR forecasts, and they have no idea which processing architecture will win AI. Hey analysts, I'll do you a favor and point you in the direction of the Hybrid Memory Cube Consortium I mentioned above. Now that I've said it, I will fight any lazy analysts who try to steal it. Fighting begins at a time and place of my choosing.

The last major conference event for me was the Joint Forces for Solar 16th PV Briefing. I learned a ton of stuff at past events thank to heavy participation from industry association leaders and DOE subject matter experts. This year was disappointing due to their absence. The solar market's dynamics show tons of solar installed here in California, not including municipal utilities. I asked a question about how geospatial analysis tools would be good sales prospect generators for installers, especially when used together with Orange Button financing data. Whoever answered me said that utilities are indeed building such tools to show customers where they can install distributed generation assets. I thus contributed some massive genius to the briefing that day. One final insight I gleaned from a presenter is that good accountants specializing in solar policies and incentives can add value to business customers installing large energy assets through off-balance sheet financing.

I did prowl all of the expo floors but I did not have time to query enough exhibitors on their business pain points. I did score an armload of free reading material, a handful of free candy, and a brain dump of interactive tech experiences. I even met a local steampunk enthusiast working for one of the exhibitors. Those folks must be all over the tech sector. They go into hibernation when they're not at the Maker Faire or big hackathons.

Intersolar and SEMICON West are always winners for me. I also like ees, and I would like them even more if they adopt proper capitalization. I shall return next year to see if that happens.

Saturday, January 30, 2016

Thursday, January 28, 2016

Safely Transporting Oil By Railroad

The oil price crash impacts the railroad sector. Transporting freight gets cheaper, but demand for railcars to bring oil out of the Bakken fields and other places where pipelines were never laid is now dropping off. Refer to US DOT MARAD's 2008 study "Impact of High Oil Prices on Freight Transportation" for technical discussions of how the rail sector behaved under different conditions. Times have changed, perhaps permanently. Safety rules can also change with the times.

Railroad accidents made headlines when America's oil shale boom was roaring. Horrific, sensational railcar explosions are less useful justifications for transportation policymaking than statistics. The US DOT's Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Office of Safety Analysis has the data. Running a ten-year report shows that total accidents declined by over 31% from 2006 to 2015, with percentage declines in every single subcategory. Rail transport has gotten safer than ever during the oil shale boom.

Oil shale's critics used to claim that Bakken oil was more volatile and thus more dangerous to ship in railcars. The National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB) chair debunked this claim after some high-profile accidents. A refining industry study also found that Bakken crude fits within existing oil safety standards. The volume of fuel spilled, not its chemical composition, determines its potential hazard. Anyone can search the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) website for "Bakken crude" and see the evidence.

Forest Ethics does the public a disservice with its alarmist Oil Train Blast Zone tool. The relatively small number of rail accidents could never endanger millions of Americans, as the tool misleadingly implies. Requiring railroad operating companies to emplace blast barriers around every yard and connecting track in populated areas would be costly and probably unnecessary. It would be better for the railroad industry, along with FRA and NTSB, to take a Six Sigma approach to estimating deaths from oil-related transport accidents. Reducing mortality is important and statistics will show us exactly which locations need better safety measures.

Policy advocates are often remarkably ignorant of science, math, and economics. I don't think a typical anti-hydrocarbon advocate can perform an energy returned on energy invested (EROEI) comparison between biofuels (for example) and hydrocarbon fuels. They are welcome to start with refining and transport data from the Western States Petroleum Association and the California Energy Commission but I don't think they'll have the patience to get very far.

I am not prepared to demonize tar sands and oil shale as "extreme fuels" in the style of some renewable energy advocates. Hydrocarbon energy will be part of human life for a few more decades until renewable energy's infrastructure catches up. Pipelines are the safest and cheapest way to transport oil over long distances. Railcars are still the next best way despite the pleadings of safety paranoiacs.

Saturday, December 19, 2015

The Haiku of Finance for 12/19/15

Smart generator
Runs green and orders its parts
Site power backup

Offsite Power Equipment And Component Supply Chains

It's ten o'clock at night somewhere and you're running an off-grid power source for some remote site, or even an urban site on the grid that needs back-up power. Suddenly some component in the generator fails and part of your site is without power. Your smart microgrid software management system kicks in and instantly routes power from other generators to the affected area. Coverage is instantly back on. In theory, this is how every microgrid power system should work. In reality, everything comes down to the grid's supply chains.

Hydrocarbon-based power generators are well understood after decades of use in construction and mining. Renewable energy micropower systems are just now coming into their own. The recently concluded 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (aka Paris COP21) climate and energy accords will make any hydrocarbon-based power source increasingly expensive in perpetuity. The market for off-site renewable power thus gets a big global regulatory boost.

The major equipment providers should start retooling now to offer the kinds of off-grid renewable power sources that will now be in vogue. The component supply chains for these things are not always completely portable to renewables. Putting solar panels on a generator means sorting through lots of Chinese panel makers and German rack makers. A lot of Chinese solar companies won't be around in a decade as that country's industry shakeout proceeds. Equipment makers should choose their solar suppliers with future reliability and surge order capacity in mind.

Quite a few apartment complexes and office towers here in San Francisco have some kind of power backup system. The property managers will have to seriously consider replacing any diesel-powered systems they own with renewable systems once COP21 emissions controls become US standards. Here comes a bonanza for equipment companies riding the leading edge of generator and storage system adaptation. The ones whose products survive will do their homework now on solar and battery components.

Wednesday, August 12, 2015

Continuing Oil Crash Points The Way To 2015's Energy Bargains

The second coming of 2015's oil bear market is going on right about now.  Plenty of bargain hunters who thought they bought into the bottom of the oil rout a few months ago are having buyer's remorse.  Watch Brent fall to 49 today and WTI fall to 43 as Saudi pumping cuts the legs out from under US shale producers.  Energy stocks can still get cheaper.  Finding the ones likely to survive this bear market takes serious sleuthing.

Forget about hunting junk bond bargains.  The oil services sector in the US is not done culling its own herd.  Junior producers are still pumping at full volume just to make it look like they can service their high-yield debt with cash flow.  That charade still has a few more months to run.  Any hedge funds or well-heeled private investors who think energy sector junk bonds have bottomed are welcome to try their luck.  Some people learn the hard way.

Other oil targets abound.  Owning BNO means betting on Brent crude futures and owning USO means betting on WTI crude futures.  Any compression between the Brent and WTI spot prices reduces the potential for arbitrage between these two ETFs.  More exotic bets like DBO and USL look like very complicated ways of leveraging a single commodity price.  Simple securities have fewer risks than complex ones.  The ETFs and other instruments betting on the magnitude of changes in oil prices have more moving parts than I can track.

The least complex ETF for exposure to the oil producing sector is probably XLE,  Holding a representative sample of large energy producers means each producer's operating costs are diversified away.  A simple equity ETF also has no internal leverage, so it does not expose its owners to exorbitant expenses or magnify their losses.  The P/E of 22 still looks high and resembles the broader equity market's high P/E after years of central bank stimulus.  A weakening sector should be priced at a bargain to the broader market, so XLE may have further to fall.

The price of oil itself may have further to fall.  Saudi Arabia is not reducing its production.  Storage is full in the US and shipping companies are seeing booming business in chartering tankers just for offshore storage.  Iran may have already begun selling the oil it has stored and will certainly increase production later in 2015 as the end of sanctions allow it to export.  I do not believe oil traders have priced in the effects of full production from Iran and other Middle Eastern countries that badly need hard currency.  More pain for the US oil sector means more bargain entry points for investors.

Full disclosure:  No positions in any securities mentioned.

Monday, August 10, 2015

Resource Sector Companies Should Use FEL And PDRI For Innovative Planning

One of my pet peeves about tracking investment in the natural resource sector is the often amateurish approach some executives take when developing projects.  Junior companies often mistakenly assume that completing a preliminary economic analysis (PEA) is a milestone in itself, without realizing the importance of planning their fundraising to fulfill the PEA's requirements.  Fortunately, help is available for junior mining companies.  Front-end loading (FEL) and the Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) will make all the difference.

Process-oriented sectors use FEL stages to segment a project into deliverable milestones, with the hardest thinking up front.  This is a key approach for successful project managers who complete projects on time, under budget, and with little degradation in net present value (NPV).  Independent Project Analysis (IPA) has tracked project efficiency for decades, and their publicly available literature reveals how FEL adds value.  The mineral sector is one of the least successful in delivering project value, according to IPA's research.  I can totally see why after thinking about all of the junior mining company presentations I have attended.

Project planners using FEL should acquaint themselves with PDRI.  The Construction Industry Institute has a very robust approach to scoring a PDRI.  They are not alone.  The US DOE has modified the PDRI to incorporate environmental management.  Professional bodies have studied PDRI's value.  The Project Management Institute notes how PDRI augments their body of knowledge.  Managers building a project team should involve their auditors early in the FEL-1 gate and equip them with PDRI checklists.

Mining startups may lack the human capital to incorporate PDRI scoring into their first FEL stage.  Experienced project geologists who become junior mining company CEOs are more likely to keep up on industry developments that exemplify FEL planning.  I cannot recall ever hearing a mining company CEO with a background in banking or consulting who ever described their active projects in FEL or PDRI terms.  All the hints they need are in their initial NI 43-101 reports.  Properly sequencing those discoveries into development milestones is within a modern geologist's professional competence.  Former investment bank analysts who take over as mining CEOs probably won't take the hints.

Large, well-capitalized companies in the resource sector have an easier time building a strong project team early in a mine's life cycle.  Junior mining companies should do similar quality work at a smaller scale if they want their projects to show robust economics.  Waiting until a bankable feasibility study is complete after several years of exploration is too late.  Delays in determining project completion requirements adds risk and makes junior miners less desirable as acquisition targets.  Small-cap mining companies that take FEL and PDRI seriously will demonstrate better long-term project economics and increase their chance of achieving an attractive valuation.  Widespread adoption of FEL and PDRI concepts among junior resource sector companies would be a welcome innovation.

Thursday, May 07, 2015

The Haiku of Finance for 05/07/15

Building retrofit
Data shows energy saved
More rental income

Getting Energetic At ETCC Quarterly Meeting

I attended the Emerging Technologies Coordinating Council (ETCC) quarterly meeting in San Francisco last week.  They were "Charting the Course to Integrated Solutions" this time at PG+E's SOMA complex.  It made perfect sense to convene talks on building integrated solutions at one of the best local clearinghouses for the topic.  I was charting my own course to building systems knowledge and free food.  All of those elements were on hand.


The ETCC's support for early tech development reminds me of the Federal Laboratory Consortium's CRADA programs.  The TRIO outreach to investors and analysts is especially noteworthy; once I'm on the TRIO invitation list my genius should prove indispensable.  Someone mentioned a widely published report on green portfolios and REITs that more people in the finance sector should read.  Finance types should also review the handbooks at Savings by Design and New Buildings Institute to see how developers are designing construction projects that will command premium rents.

I have heard engineering and design professionals discuss biomimetics as an efficient design principle.  One ETCC speaker mentioned biophilia as if it were the next evolution in design.  I would like to see how that plays out.  Biomimetics gives us individual devices and structures that look like they came from the natural environment's sustainable processes.  Biophilia should link those devices to larger social systems.

Public domain statistics on zero net energy (ZNE) buildings show California leading the US.  This implies a large addressable market for things like IoT components that snap into efficient buildings.  The growth of solar tech and integrated energy storage solutions is getting lots of buzz.  Let's see the stats from market leaders.  Tesla Motors and SolarCity are pumping that hype machine for all it's worth.

I was not surprised to learn that finance types in the energy sector lack the technical competence to evaluate a product's viability.  The claim that PACE providers of integrated packages are typically more creditworthy than mortgage lenders reflects this lack of understanding.  Financing a new building upgrade with a PACE assessment can easily lead to wasted investments if the proposed retrofit technology doesn't deliver as promised.

The experts on hand revealed that obtaining ZNE benefits through retrofit is still difficult with CPUC code restrictions that discourage improvements in older buildings.  Larger frameworks like ecodistricts and energy use intensity (EUI) encourage developers to think beyond the ROI of a single building when redeveloping a neighborhood.  Developers are learning how to charge premium rents for ZNE buildings by calculating accelerated lease-ups and lower operating expenses after retrofits.

Finance people who need to recalculate the ROIs of ZNE targets can find helpful data at UC Berkeley's Center for the Built Environment and DOE LBL's Flexlab.  Peer-reviewed technical data isn't just for engineers and architects.  It matters in calculating the added rent per square foot a ZNE building earns.  Find the energy cost savings first, fellow analysts.

I'm certain that geospatial Big Data on sunshine, wind, and cloud cover  will play a role in optimizing a ZNE building for a local climate.  Analytics are the low-hanging fruit of any disruptive opportunity in building construction.  Building systems are complex and diverse standards complicate integration.  A unified data source of best practices would be a valuable and disruptive tool for real estate developers.  I'd like to see the UC Berkeley and DOE tools include APIs that make monetizing the data easy.

I have not heard the last of ETCC's bright ideas.  The startups I mentor in the Cleantech Open will be glad that I'm on top of these developments.  Forget the finance sector people who don't know what they're talking about.  Alfidi Capital suffers no such deficiency because I know where to look for data.

Friday, March 13, 2015

Saturday, January 10, 2015

Hemisphere Energy Corp. Pumping Alberta's Liquid Oil

Hemisphere Energy Corp. (HME.V) drills for liquid oil in Canada.  They are fortunate that Canada is such a friendly place for extractive enterprise.  Canada remains favorably ranked in both the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index (10th out of 175) and the Heritage Foundation Index of Economic Freedom (6th out of 178).  Their CEO is a geologist, which I like to see in a junior exploration company.

The company develops two projects in Alberta and one in British Columbia.  Attlee Buffalo and Jenner have somewhat different economics, as far as I can tell from their corporate statements.  It looks like Atlee Buffalo is the more attractive property, so they must preserve their flexibility to adjust production for each well.  I reviewed their annual statement dated April 14, 2014 (found in SEDAR) for some interesting tidbits.  Part of Note 8 on page 43 described an impairment charge of over $5.6M in 2012 for assets whose estimated reserves declined past the threshold of economic recovery.  It stands to reason that announcements of land package deals in the junior exploration space mean less than geological estimates of OOIP.

Hemisphere's most recent financial statements for Q3 2014 describe favorable netbacks and positive net income.  The company achieved these results before the price of WTI crude crashed to below $50/bbl.  I noticed that the line in their financial statement for "Average realized prices for crude" as of Sept. 30, 2014 was $77.97, when the average benchmark WTI for that quarter was $97.17.  The weaker Canadian dollar is a boon for Canadian producers like Hemisphere because Canadian exported oil is cheaper for US refineries even as the WTI price for US-produced oil continues to fall.  Nonetheless, Hemisphere and other juniors will continue to find it challenging to sell at competitive prices in this weak market for oil.

The company's current liabilities were almost eight times as large as their current assets as of Sept. 30.  That is very worrisome given their positive net earnings of only $833K for the quarter.  I do not see how they will be able to cover their liabilities into 2015 without raising significant amounts of new cash.  Raising more capital will dilute existing shareholders.

I will take a pass on this particular company.  Hemisphere's high costs negate its attractive netbacks in an era when WTI is crashing.  The Canadian dollar's weakness against the US dollar won't last forever, so Canadian juniors have a very limited window in which to build either a cash hoard or production growth that will sustain them in the difficult months ahead.

Full disclosure:  No position in Hemisphere Energy at this time.  

Friday, December 12, 2014

Saturday, September 20, 2014

Climate on the Brain is Powering Innovation to Create Climate Wealth

Three recent Commonwealth Club events on how our brains understand climate change, how to promote sustainable innovation in the energy sector, and how to create wealth from climate change prompted me to think about how they all tie together.  Notice how I strung the titles of those talks together to make the title of my own blog article.  Good artists borrow, and great artists steal, so yeah I'm taking a page out of old William Shakespeare's playbook.

George Marshall's Don't Even Think About It is heir to a long tradition in psychology that describes how the human brain has difficulty comprehending abstractions.  Emotion-based arguments usually overcome cognitive barriers in the majority of humans.  Appeals to authority also help.  This is why faith-based organizations like Alliance of Religions and Conservation and Catholic Climate Covenant will play a key role in winning conservatives over for the climate change argument.  Bernays' techniques matter in selling climate change to low-information, high-emotion masses with large cognitive deficiencies.  A "master narratives" study of how tribes communicate in the climate change debate would reveal much.  The human evolutionary bias to underappreciate risks for abstract things like climate change probably has much in common with behavioral finance's understanding of poor investor behavior.

Climate change is like any innovative concept, where early adopters form a beachhead that proves a viable market exists.  Social psychology and persuasive technology can produce enough compelling stories to reach the late adopter market in climate change.  The Citizens Climate Lobby should be an excellent channel for storytelling targeting late adopters.  Human interest stories matter more than narratives using facts or fear.  Talented national politicians have dropped names of average schmucks into their major speeches during the Internet Age.  Average people can see themselves in those average stories.

Once the narrative frames consumers for adoption, industry must have a minimum viable product ready for purchase.  Industry's problem is that it has offered few tangible moneymaking products addressing climate change.  Utilities invest in carbon capture because raw carbon is a viable feedstock in automobile tires, advanced fuels, and construction materials.  Scaling problems have hindered the promise of carbon capture.  Commercializing carbon ideas from government laboratories would be more successful if the tech developers follow the NSF I-Corps model.

Government research is more effective in powering energy innovation than government loans, as we all saw with the Solyndra debacle.  Some in government and the energy sector learned nothing from that failure.  BrightSource Energy got a $1.6B DOE loan guarantee for a solar thermal project that lowers the cost of capital for NRG Energy and Google.  What a sweet deal.  NRG also benefits from this $1.2B DOE loan guarantee for a solar PV project.  These loan guarantees are a central-planning approach to funding energy innovation.  The capital markets now have a better way to fund energy with the "yield co" publicly traded structures.

Large projects do not suffer from lack of funding with Google, Warren Buffett, and George Soros throwing money around.  Smaller projects still need a push from entrepreneurs seeking wealth.  Too much conflicting information on the risks and rewards of sustainable business models poses a problem for entrepreneurs.  Advocates of social entrepreneurship ignore the higher costs of capital and higher risks inherent in many community-based business models that will never scale up to address large markets.  NREL published several guides to community solar as good foundation references, available by searching DOE's OSTI archives.

Cleantech entrepreneurs need many baseline references because too many self-serving pontificators on both sides of the climate change debate have muddied the water.  I have heard "experts" claim at the Commonwealth Club that China and India value US carbon capture technology because they are still building coal plants.  I have also heard the Club's invited experts claim that China's prospects of "Peal Coal" and India's poor quality coal mean they will need expensive coal imports.  These positions are reconcilable if developing countries' energy plans balance increased generation capacity with increased resource exploration.  Give engineers and economists in those countries the credit they deserve.

The key to wisdom is understanding where each side in a debate gets their basic data.  Utilities constantly iterate their supply adjustments to meet demand, using real-time data and decades of modeling experience.  If coal and gas power plants cannot spin up turbines individually in sufficient time to smooth out "duck curve" evening demand in the US, then it makes sense for utilities to invest in transmission lines across time zones.  A true national grid would not allow gaps between the eastern and western parts of the US to limit supply flexibility.  Closing the gap is a matter of time, and in the meantime utilities buy energy futures contracts to hedge their demand forecasts.  Utilities also have a strong interest in grid storage, smart grids, and predictive analytics that together make smoothing the duck curve more efficient.  Anyone who shorts utility stocks in the face of the sector's incoming tidal wave of innovation has been reading too much gloom and doom literature.

I have argued before that hedging civilization's bets on climate change is much like Pascal's Wager.  The worst outcome of preparation is a more efficient use of limited natural resources, even if climate change proves to be groundless.  The best outcome is the preservation of the only known biosphere in this corner of the galaxy.  I trust our elites to get the programming correct so Spaceship Earth stays on the right course.

Thursday, July 24, 2014

The Haiku of Finance for 07/24/14

Mexico opens
Privatizing energy
End Pemex control

Lynden Energy Caught My Eye and Confused Me

Lynden Energy (LVL.V, LVLEF) is a Canadian company drilling for oil and gas in Texas.  It is very uncommon for a low-priced stock to have a positive P/E ratio.  I wonder what's going on with this company.  The management page does not list detailed bios at this time, so it's hard for me to judge their skill.

The company's projects page mentions two projects.  The Mitchell Ranch 50% working interest has little detail describing the project's status.  I find their Wolfberry project to be similarly confusing.  I honestly cannot tell what these land holdings are doing at this stage from reading these few paragraphs.

I had to check out their financial statements.  Their unaudited statements from March 31, 2014 show US$12.8M in cash on hand and positive net income, although their income is much lower than what they earned one year prior.  This continued profitability enables them to work down their accumulated retained earnings deficit, which is always good in any company.  They do admit in that document that access to capital impacts their future as a going concern and that they once took an impairment charge from writing off a bad investment in natural gas transmission operations.  I find it odd that they noted a disposal sale of some Wolfberry wells and leases for a one-time gain, in the same area they tout in their website's project listings.

The numbers look alright but I can't figure out from their publicly available material just how they're making this work.  Lynden should publish their properties' 51-101 reports on their website if they have competed versions.  They also need continued access to capital and to stay away from non-core operations like gas transmission.  I just don't know enough about their operations to figure out their chances for success, and that's why I can't expose my portfolio to this company.

Full disclosure:  No position in Lynden Energy at this time.  

Monday, April 28, 2014

Financial Sarcasm Roundup for 04/28/14

I found exactly one item that deserves sarcasm today.  There are undoubtedly others but this one shall be mine.  The multinational energy sector is starting to freak out over the West's sanctions against Russia.  They haven't reached complete screaming mode yet because their stress is confined to legal counsel and risk managers.  The worry really begins when Russia makes its next move.

Ukraine's oil drilling concessions to Western supermajors and its gas pipelines to Europe are very attractive assets.  Russian forces are likely to seize those assets if they enter Ukraine under the guise of peacekeeping.  Russia's state-sponsored energy companies act as arms of its national grand strategy.  President Putin and his allies in the Russian deep state desire more than a recreation of the 18th Century Novorossiya.  They covet Ukraine's assets as compensation for the payments Ukraine has been unable to make on its debts.  Ukraine's own deep state elites, aka its nationalist oligarchs, got a little too greedy after many years.  Now it's time to pay the piper.

Nation-states don't look like debt-collection rackets in history books but Americans never had the patience to read much history.  That's why Russia's aggression in the Donbas takes so many Americans by surprise.  Lower-class Americans only experience the repo man when he comes for their automobile after they can't make car loan payments anymore.  Transnational repossessions happen when strong nations want their weaker neighbors to pay their debts.