Showing posts with label molybdenum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label molybdenum. Show all posts

Saturday, July 20, 2013

Thompson Creek Metals (TC) and Molybdenum Prices

Thompson Creek Metals (TC) mines molybdenum.  It's really helpful that they currently display the market price for moly on their corporate site.  One would think that with several properties and a metallurgical facility they'd be vertically integrated enough to process their own production and that of other miners.

The CEO has been in charge of this company and its pre-merger predecessor for a long time.  It's his show and he wants to retire this year.  He has no academic training in geology or mining engineering, and much of his career involved crafting merger deals.  The COO is also a BA/law grad but with more operational experience in mining.  The rest of this team has been around mining, metallurgy, and related industries for a while.

The good news about their Thompson Creek moly mine is that they have solid 2P estimates.  The bad news is that the mine's 43-101 assumes a moly price of $12/lb.  Check the site's front page again; this week's average moly oxide price was $9.40.  Check the price of moly at InfoMine if you need a second opinion.  This mine is operating at a severe disadvantage.  The Endarko mine also has plenty of 2P ore but its estimates also depend on a long-term moly price of $12/lb.  I don't see how the company can sustain production at a price below the long-term estimate of the price it needs to be successful.

Thompson is developing other projects.  The Mt. Milligan project is almost completely developed but the Cu concentrates and Au grades are extremely poor.  The price of gold has dropped significantly since 2012.  The company's other exploration projects are too early to value, but Berg Property's low MII grades are not encouraging.

The single most important thing I've learned about the mining sector is that a mining company's valuation is determined by the relationship between its grades, its cash costs of production, and the market price of its final product.  Those things matter more than anything else.  A company cannot indefinitely produce a metal at a cash cost that exceeds that metal's world price.  Projects whose costs exceed world prices must either cut their costs or eventually shut down.  Moly prices are at four year lows.  Thompson Creek Metals had massive losses in 2012 and has just barely turned in positive net income as of March 2013.  They will need some serious cost cutting at their two moly mines or a major positive surprise in the grades at their exploratory projects.

Full disclosure:  No position in TC at this time.

Monday, January 14, 2013

Dart Mining (DTM.AX) Exploring for Metals

Dart Mining (DTM.AX) is developing Mo / Cu / Ag deposits in Australia.  I've finally figured out that small Australian companies name their head cheese Managing Director instead of CEO.  Dart's MD has worked in mining engineering and various sectors supporting the mining value chain, and its Chairman is a geologist.  That's pretty cool.

Their most advanced property right now is their Unicorn project, with power, water, and roads already nearby.  The MII grades for each of those three metals are very low compared to world averages for new discoveries.  IMHO the company will have a hard time making that project viable if metal prices collapse, even if the planned mine has a low strip ratio.  Their other projects are still exploration targets with no 43-101 data although a couple of their drill results show promising Au grades.  Dart Mining is benefiting from local government grants that help fund its early exploration program, which is undeniably helpful in conserving investors' cash.

Their 2012 annual report shows their burn rate has doubled to over $1M/year since they stepped up their drilling programs.  They had just under $3.5M in cash on hand on June 30, 2012, giving them about three and a half years in which to strike valuable grades at any of their active projects.

Dart Mining trades under a dime right now but they have plenty of time to discover valuable deposits.  I'd like to see what their drilling programs find later in 2013.

Full disclosure:  No position in Dart Mining at this time.

Sunday, December 30, 2012

Imperial Metals (IPMLF) Is Not The Miner For Me

Imperial Metals (IPMLF / III.TO) has two operating mines and several developmental and exploration properties.  I'd prefer to analyze them using value investing criteria since they are not a startup mining company, but some details of their properties deserve mention.

Their Mount Polly mine is operating but its 2P reserves are very low grade.  I'd say the same for their Huckleberry mine.  The MII resource grade at their Red Chris developmental project is similarly unimpressive.  What are their cash costs of production?  I have no idea, but I wonder whether these projects  would be worth doing if the price of gold were half of what it is today.  The Sterling project, however, has a very impressive 7.41 g/t Au, so here's hoping they get it started.  It's too early to tell whether their three exploration properties will pan out.

Imperial is earning positive net income but their five-year EPS growth is negative and their five-year ROE is below the mining sector's average.  Those are reasons enough for me not to own this stock, besides the low ore grades for their active mines.

Full disclosure:  No position in Imperial Metals at this time.

Friday, March 30, 2012

Tosca Mining (TSMNF) Digs Tex-Mex Dirt From Vancouver

I got an unsolicited email from somebody who wants me to check out Tosca Mining (TSMNF), another penny stock from Vancouver, Canada.  This person didn't disclose whether they had a relationship with the company but they urged me to check out some analyst's video.  I don't waste time listening to someone else's analysis.  My own thinking is like so totally way better.

If you can follow the oddities of my post's title, you may be able to guess that Tosca is a Vancouver-based company digging a project in Texas near the Mexican border.  Many larger firms have tried here to no avail.  If all of those major operators couldn't find economically viable ore grades after two decades of exploratory drilling, I have no idea how a small driller is going to accomplish anything.  It's nice to see that the CEO and other execs are real geologists and miners.  The company has been around since at least 2007 according to its SEDAR filing history but presently has little success to show for its history.  Five years should be long enough for even lifelong miners to figure out that a property explored for decades probably has questionable value.

Please note that the share structure will eventually result in massive shareholder dilution if the company makes any progress towards operating a successful mine.  Really good news will make the share price rise but will also risk triggering activation of warrants; the new equity will thus dissipate over a larger number of shares.  The work done so far on site is very limited, with holes that have very small traces of mineralization.  The 43-101 estimate Tosca released last month has no estimate of proven and probable reserves.

The chance of success for Tosca's sole project is not strong enough to be worth my further attention.  I'd rather not risk massive dilution.

Full disclosure:  No position in TSMNF, ever.